German Angst. Der Spiegel explains the Web.

So if you want to get a sense of how media in Germany explains their readers the web go and check out tomorrow’s cover of ‘Der Spiegel’. This time it’s about the ‘Digital Underworld. The secret web of Internet Criminals.’

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is how ‘Der Spiegel’ explained Facebook a couple of months ago: ‘The insatiables’. Of course well promoted on Der Spiegel’s Facebook Page.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In 2009 Der Spiegel introduced its readers to the lawless failed state that the Internet actually is in ‘Web without Law’.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh…and I almost forgot how dumb (Doof in German) we have become since we are online.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I cannot even comment about it anymore. It’s just too painful to watch it as a German living abroad.

  • Pingback: mediaclinique | ralf schwartz

  • Markus Hesselmann

    Would it be okay to add that “Der Spiegel” ist not “Germany” and not even “media in German” but that there is a lot more to it?

  • http://mad.blogger.de/ nnier

    I cannot even comment about it anymore. It’s just too painful to watch a German living abroad explaining his readers how media in Germany explains their readers the web.

  • Anonymous

    Oh absolutely. It is just typical for a media landscape that constantly tries to user scare tactics and trigger feat among its readers. Of course only in the print issue. The web issue is very different.

  • Anonymous

    Monday morning. Let’s troll.

  • Beast

    Spiegels target group is not the digital native audience…so where’s the f***ing problem???

  • Anonymous

    The problem is that German media consistently describes the greatest invention of our era as something we have to be afraid of. It is only very rarely about the web’s opportunities and the many options we have nowadays. It’s about being afraid.

  • Anonymous

    I understand your angle. But I do not agree. What I am describing is not a detailed analysis of an article. It is a general pattern among many, many German media formats. Social networking? That’s innocent teenagers ruining their future career via Party pics. eCommerce? That’s data or credit card theft. For Germany’s media the glass is always half empty. And these cover pages illustrate that. The article does not want to do more.

  • Bassa

    Are you calling Facebook “the greatest invention of our era”?

    I don’t need Spiegel or “German Angst” (a term used by a french journalist recently regarding the german view on nuclear [nucular] energy) to not agree with you. Social networking in general is a good idea but in my opinion Facebook is working on making it uncomfortable. You do not have to agree of course, but I would prefer social networks a bit less open with my data and a bit more open with their behaviour.

    http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/index-2010-48.html – rather about the USA than about the internet or wikileaks but nevertheless it is connected

    http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/index-2010-29.html – not inducing “angst” but stating the hectic rush being online

    http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/index-2010-2.html – not only Facebook is bad, Google is too

    I don’t read Spiegel anymore so I do not know what they write in articles apart from their covers. But I don’t think that just judging by the cover is the best way to assert their opinion.
    Looking through all those covers I think there are more negative than positive covers. But I don’t think that is specific for german papers. The cover is the eye catcher, the advertisment. It is supposed to make the potential customer buy the mag. And “bad google” is probably more interessting than “our happy partner for our happy lives”. The triggered fear is supposed to make people buy the mag and read it.

    And one thing is for sure – the covers alone do neither explain the world nor the web. Judging the article by its cover is not really the best way.

  • Anonymous

    Oh no. I mean the web in general. Definitely not Facebook. What I tried to do is to describe a pattern how one of the key political magazines in Germany constantly uses scare tactics to sell. I agree that you should not judge a book by its cover. But the way these covers communicate feature their way of thinking. And in fact I have read 3 /4 of these issues. They were extremely biased and designed to trigger rejection by a 50-something target group. The way mainstream media reports about the web in Germany is unique in the way scare tactics are used to sell magazines.

  • Anonymous

    Oh. One more thing. This is the culture that I am talking about. Typical for Germany http://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/debatte-ueber-verbote-innenminister-wollen-facebook-partyexzesse-stoppen-1.1115548

  • ÆLL

    next time a friend of mine ends up with a bullet or my floor is burning down or the guy that slept on my couch is found dead because of certain ways certain people run certain buisnesses connceted to certain ‘new’ ways of communications I give a ‘Landsman’ (ass****) that lives abroad a short notice…shall I?

  • Anonymous

    I dont understand a word.

  • JL

    I also think that’s a bit too easy. Sometimes I have the impression that people react especially hurt when the Spiegel does something like this, even more so of course with a topic that is dear to them, as if this was some kind of personal let-down and they had deserved better. But the Spiegel has to make money, just like any other newspaper, and provoking or overstating is one way to do this. They also do this with business topics, with politics and many more.

    The first cover does not explain “the web”. It illustrates the “digital underworld”. From an aesthetic point of view, I think it’s a nice one.

    The second cover is a bit silly, but I must admit I think it’s funny, too, and I even agree to the assertion that Facebook is “insatiable”.

    The other two: I would have to read the articles to form an opinion, but the covers are eye-catchers. So they did their job.

    As for “German Angst”: it’s an overrated, overused term, and I find it interesting that Americans like to use it a lot, and in a strangely different sense than we do. Anyway, Germany, in my opinion, is not a country of frightened, unknowning, unenlightened old people. Of course they exist. Still, the Germans are using the internet, very much so, and all other kinds of modern technologies, many of which they help to develop for the better or worse.

    And I’m a bit tired of people, no matter whether German, Non-Germans or Germans abroad, telling me how awfully backward Germany is, and how much more informed, better connected and insightful they are.

    Sorry, no offense. But as I said: that’s too easy. 

  • Anonymous

    Fair points. As I said, my claim is as much an exaggeration as the Spiegel covers. Of course I know that Der Spiegel is not an enemy of technology per se. But they play with the web scepticism of their (older) readership to sell magazines at the expense of the public’s opinion towards the web. No, Germans also are not necessarily anti-tech. Nevertheless tech adoption in Germany is comparably lower and idiotic nonsense such as the European cookie guidelines (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12668552) or the discussion around prohibiting Facebook Parties (http://www.heute.de/ZDFheute/inhalt/25/0,3672,8249497,00.html?dr=1) is result of that mindset. Wherever Germany thinks it can regulate…it will. Thanks to messages sent out by mainstream media that the web is a threatening place.

  • Bassa

    Ah, sorry, I missunderstood your greatest invention of the era.

    The whole web is definitly closer to that than Facebook alone.

    I think it is not difficult to trigger rejection in the 50-something
    target group concerning web and other modern gadgets, means of
    communication etc. It would be much more difficult to trigger acceptance
    in those people because in general they already have their opinion and
    is often rock solid rejection. It is a bit like “Today’s youth!”. But that is a rather old opinion.

    Although I heard in the news today that the number of germans using
    internet has increased again, and the group with the highest increase is
    people 60+. That leaves room for hope.

    I still think that the scare tactics are not only used concerning web
    topics but in general – at least judging by the cover. As I mentioned
    before I don’t read Spiegel anymore because it is not nearly as good as
    it used to be years ago.

  • Thomas N.

    “As I said, my claim is as much an exaggeration as the Spiegel covers” – that really sounds like a Blogger: ‘you must not do so, but I am allowed to’ -> you think the Spiegel covers are an exaggeration, hence a Bad Thing – you publish such an exaggeration yourself.

    If you really think an exaggeration is a Bad Thing (at least in journalism and similar fields), then you should steer clear of those exaggerations for yourself.

    You may argue about that, saying that you are allowed to write and blog about anything you want to, in the style you prefer – that’s fine. However, in case you just write what you think, you may notice that not everyone in the world shares your opinion.
    Freedom of speech doesn’t mean being free of arguments – however, your actual give no arguments but the Spiegel covers, which means that you article IS free of arguments.

  • Thomas N.

    Thanks, nnier. That’s probably the best comment. Exactly my thoughts.

  • Anonymous

    That’s your perception. Its a rant about a German phenomenon. And I can make an argument here without going into a deep text analysis. The covers I see serve as teasers to buy the magazine. It’s the condensation of the core message. And I am ranting about these cheap shots. Nothing else. It is Populism what Spiegel does. Biased, nothing else. And this is the argument I make.

  • Pingback: German Angst - PolitikPla.net

  • Pingback: German Angst - Seite 2 - PolitikPla.net

  • Simon Neate-Stidson

    so naturally, if der spiegel hates the internet so much, they wouldn’t have a website then, right? oh, hang on, they do….

  • Anonymous

    It is more complex than that. Der Spiegel bashes Facebook in the print issue while they advertise the same issue through their Facebook page. Strange.

  • http://leonidobusch.blogspot.com Leonido

    Thank you very, very much for putting together this great collection!

Other Entries

Davaidavai? What’s that?

Hi, I am Gerald Hensel and I am your host tonight.

Davaidavai is a blog about the stuff which drives my professional life. Digital ideas, social media, advertising in and beyond the 1s and 0s that seem to have taken control of pretty much everything… I work as Strategy Consultant for Blast Radius, Amsterdam. To check out what I do beyond davaidavai, simply follow this link. And don't forget to send me a message in case there is anything left to say.

The thoughts and opinions on this aite are my own, and not that of my employer.

Subscribe to davaidavai

Follow on twitter

More davaidavai on Facebook

Recent Pins.

Follow Me on Pinterest

The feed

Get it via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License